What does it mean when the prime minister wants to cut back on crossbench staffing?

By Tom Ravlic

June 29, 2022

Anthony Albanese standing in a dark doorway
We see you, prime minister. (AAP Image/Lukas Coch)

When a new prime minister comes up with an idea of cutting back expenditure on advisers working in the office of crossbench parliamentarians, it produces some fascinating public discourse. 

It’s worth considering a range of implications that arise as a result of the proposal to take the garden shears to the funding given to crossbenchers for parliamentary staff.

Cost of living was high on the list of issues before the electorate during the recent election campaign and it is clear that the government wants to send a message that politicians are not going to be exempt from cutbacks.

This apparently includes those politicians on the crossbench who were newly elected in May and are only now learning about how the allocation of staff works for those representing voters in the big house on the hill.

The optics at one level are interesting.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today