The ICJ’s provisional orders provide lessons about the Genocide Convention for Australia

By Binoy Kampmark

January 30, 2024

Albanese walks the diplomatic tightrope on genocide
Albanese walks the diplomatic tightrope on genocide. (Zennie/Private Media)

Australia has a spotty history with the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the convention, or UNGC). Despite Australia being the second signatory to the 1948 convention, laws punishing genocide were only implemented into domestic statute books by the International Criminal Court (Consequential Amendments) Act 2002 (Cth).

Given a specific intent to destroy a group on the basis of its national, ethnical, racial or religious makeup is central to the offence, Australian lawmakers and decision-makers were potentially vulnerable to the blighted matter of Indigenous policy.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today