Why we might keep getting participation wrong — like we have for 20 years

By Bernard Keane

August 29, 2023

Jim Chalmers
Treasurer Jim Chalmers. (AAP Image/Mick Tsikas)

For 20 years, a key part of the intergenerational reports produced by governments of both persuasions has been badly wrong. And they’ve known it. Luckily, it’s proved a good kind of wrong. But examining why the best minds in the country have erred on a key policy issue might prove instructive.

Since the first one in 2002, the reports have focused on the three Ps — population, productivity and workforce participation. Treasury has got each of them wrong. The early reports badly underestimated population growth, our productivity performance fell into a hole because of WorkChoices and has never fully recovered (except for a burst under the Rudd-Gillard governments), and each report has been badly off-beam on the participation rate.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today