Expanding the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security

By Binoy Kampmark

May 17, 2023

Mike Burgess-Parliamentary Joint Security and Intelligence Committee-PJCIS
The PJCIS tends to keep itself small and limited to the major parties. ASIO boss Mike Burgess. (AAP Image/Lukas Coch)

In democratic political systems, security should, axiomatically, be assumed to be representative.

Far from being the preserve of an elite drawn from one party or two, the national interest would be better served, intuition goes, by having a cross-section of parliamentary representatives. This is not a view held by a number of more traditionally minded politicians.

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) has tended to keep the club small and limited to the major parties. The rationale for doing so has been as much a consequence of the material being received by its members, and its powers.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today