War decision reforms in Australia affirm the status quo

By Binoy Kampmark

April 14, 2023

Jordon Steele-John
Australian Greens senator Jordon Steele-John. (AAP Image/Lukas Coch)

The war-making prerogatives of the Westminster system present a dilemma. Given that sending individuals into battle is the gravest of tasks, the decision, one might assume, would require a number of steps and decision-makers: consultations, debates and a vote by the citizens’ elected representatives.

In Australia, this is simply not the case. The National Security Committee, comprising inner cabinet members, which includes the prime minister, determines whether Australia goes to war. In its functions, the committee mirrors the British monarchical traditions of old, one that marginalises the role of parliamentary oversight.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today