Aquatic costings: Divorce and the Franco-Australian submarine agreement

By Binoy Kampmark

June 14, 2022

Naval Group
Ah, good times. Former French president Francois Hollande (2nd r), Pierre Eric Pommellet (l), Thales Australia CEO Chris Jenkins (2nd l), and Thales employee Bernard Boucher (r), in 2014. (AP Photo/Dan Himbrechts)

Divorce settlements are rarely light affairs, and the creation of AUKUS was always going to come at a price for Australia. The scuppering of the diesel submarine deal between the Naval Group and Canberra in favour of nuclear-powered submarines and technology furnished by the US and the UK flayed Franco-Australian relations. But it also raised the thorny issue of what quantum of compensation would follow.

The Naval Group, of which the French government has a majority share, was unreserved in what it hoped to achieve in the settlement.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today