Fumio Kishida facing nuclear weapons dilemma

By Alan Callow

October 20, 2021

Fumio Kishida
The AUKUS pact sparked a discussion in Japan about the need to switch to nuclear power and technologies. What position will the new government take? (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)

The transfer of American nuclear technologies to Australia within the AUKUS pact sparked a discussion in Japanese society about the need to switch the fleet to nuclear power and the development of nuclear technologies in general. Despite the active militarisation of the Japanese self-defense forces, Japanese society still reacts painfully to any mention of the word “nuclear”. This reaction can be expected given the Japanese are the only people in the world who have experienced the devastating power of weapons of mass destruction firsthand. What position will the new government take on this issue?

Kishida’s pre-election comments

October 4, 2021, Fumio Kishida was elected as the new prime minister of Japan. During the race, then-candidate Kishida avoided answering the question about the nuclear prospects of the Japanese fleet, speaking only about the need to improve the service conditions of Japanese sailors. Kishida’s uncertainty on such a sensitive issue is easily explained by his unwillingness to weaken its pre-election positions. However, as the prime minister, he will have to decide whether to develop nuclear military technologies.

Public pressure

The pacifist wing of the Japanese public dealt a preventive blow to the nuclear modernisation of the Japanese navy. An activist, Setsuko Turlow, who survived the bombing of Hiroshima in 1945, sent a letter to the newly elected prime minister calling for Japan to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNV). In this letter, she also reminded the new leader of his pre-election promise to work towards creating a world without nuclear weapons.

Political support

The mayor of Hiroshima prefecture, Kazuimi Matsui, supported Thurlow’s opinion. The official expressed the hope that the new government would become an observer at the conference of the parties to the UN treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. In addition, Tokyo’s refusal to build nuclear-powered submarines will enhance the image of the country often accused of unjustified militarisation.

In addition, secretary-general of the Confederation Atomic Bomb Survivors, Tanaka Terumi, called it reasonable to join TPNV to reduce regional tensions and optimise defence expenditure.

Kishida from Hiroshima

Moreover, Fumio Kishida seems to share the position of opponents to nuclear weapons. This may be influenced by the fact that the prime minister grew up in a family of politicians from Hiroshima prefecture, and his nuclear-disarmament plans let him gain popularity among the general population.

Indo-Pacific tensions

Nevertheless, public scepticism and Kishida’s anti-nuclear background go against the trend towards military opposition to the PRC in the Indo-Pacific region. Tokyo has amended the Japanese constitution and changed its military doctrine to strengthen the concept of US-Japanese deterrence to the PRC. In light of the need for increased naval capabilities, the decision to obtain and develop nuclear propulsion technologies would hardly be called unexpected.

Fumio Kishida came to power in a very difficult period. His victory is largely explained by his election promises and the people’s hope for stabilising the internal and foreign policy situation. The nuclear issue can become the central theme of Kishida’s rule as its decision will determine Japan’s nuclear development plans for many years to come.


READ MORE:

There’s a long and devastating history behind the proposal for a nuclear waste dump in South Australia

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today