Secrecy, public health and FOI

By Binoy Kampmark

July 14, 2021

Independent Senator Rex Patrick
Independent Senator Rex Patrick. (AAP Image/Lukas Coch)

Two recent examples show how Australia’s FOI laws and administration are used to frustrate rather than advance the objective of informing the public, writes Binoy Kampmark.

Freedom of Information laws were designed to shed a light upon the murky, opaque functions of government decision-making. As the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) acknowledges, in passing the act parliament intended “to increase recognition that information held by the government is to be managed for public purposes, and as a national resource.

Subscribe for unlimited access

A Mandarin Premium subscription gives you access to all articles, webinars, discounted early-bird event invites and more.

INTRO OFFER - 40% OFF

ANNUAL $440$264

Save 40% on premium access for new accounts.
Just $22/month for your first year.
Renews at $440/year until cancelled.

MONTHLY $44

Unlimited access for just $10 per week. Cancel anytime.

About the author

Any feedback or news tips? Here’s where to contact the relevant team.

The Mandarin Premium

Try Mandarin Premium for $4 a week.

Access all the in-depth briefings. New subscribers only.

Get Premium Today